NVIS - What it is and how to use it
By Patricia Gibbons - WA6UBE
NVIS , short for Near Vertical Incidence Skywave, utilizes
high-angle skywave paths between stations instead of ground-wave or
surface-wave in order to communicate via HF radio. NVIS was
originally evaluated by U.S. Army Forces in Thailand during the
Vietnam conflict in the mid-1960's It was found that Mobile stations,
using whip antennas bent parallel to the ground, could communicate
more reliably with their base-stations. Signal strengths would be
weaker using high-angle skywave but communications would be more
reliable, less subject to fading, and consistent between stations.
This was because the intervening terrain was less of an absorber of
signals. Terrain obstructions between stations, such as hills,
mountainous areas, jungle growth, built-up areas with tall buildings,
no longer become path obstructions with stations when NVIS techniques
It is important to note that as early as the first part of World
War II, NVIS antennas were
For distances out to 400 miles between stations, one F-layer hop, at vertical angles of 45 degrees or higher are used. It is not necessary to have high power transmitters. Typical 100 watt power levels are fine. It is necessary that all stations on an NVIS radio network use antennas that are parallel to the ground and the frequencies used are chosen via a radio propagation prediction program in order to have best results.
There is also on online resource that will provide near real time info on critical frequency
Frequently asked questions about NVIS:
After much research and testing of antennas over the past 5 years, it appears that the most important leg of the triangle is choice of correct frequency. Specific results will be discussed later on this page.
ACTUAL TEST RESULTS:
A field test of NVIS was planned between myself and Carl Sato, AA6CF. Carl was located in San Francisco, California. The plan was for my station to run RTTY on the amateur 40 meter band and for Carl to log the field strength of my transmitter at Carl's location. I would try different types of antenna arrangements. The plan was to have a "blind test" in that AA6CF would not know which antenna I would be on at any particular time. My station was parked in a local park in Morgan Hill, California, which is approximately 70 miles from Carl's station in San Francisco. Morgan Hill, California was chosen for this test in order to absolutely limit the ability of ground-wave signals to reach between our two stations.
My station was a mobile arrangement consisting of a restored military communications truck and used one of the following three antenna arrangements for the test:
Here is the horizontal wire antenna, deployed via
The amateur 40 meter band was used. The mobile station was set up to transmit 50 watts of "mark-idle" signal. AA6CF would then tell me the signal strength of the signal received as I rapidly changed between one of the three antenna configurations as listed above.
Another field-test done in the Fall of 1990:
During the Boy Scout "Jamboree on the Air" (JOTA) event. My communications truck was set up at the San Jose Red Cross facility in their large parking lot.
Another Field Test - Spring of 1993:
A dipole antenna in this test was located extremely close to the ground, and quantified measurements were made of it's performance in relation to a dipole antenna at more "normal" heights above ground.
Both antenna were balanced to ground and matched with antenna tuners for minimum reflected power.
Ground conditions in the area were chosen in order to provide a "worst-case" as far as attenuation of the signal due to soil proximity. The ground was "soppy" wet due to recent rainfall. These conditions would degrade the measured performance of these two antennas significantly as the soil conductivity would be extremely good, even at ground-level.
Displayed below is a detail regarding the use of 3/4-inch
The observation was made, by most of us in attendance, that the
work involved in
Yes, that's me in the photo above, with an HT in my back pocket
and bent-over while
Post-Test equipment check:
The Yaesu FT70/G was checked with a Motorola Model 2410 Communications Service monitor to verify the actual difference in meter indications for an "S" meter reading of "S8" and "10 dB over S9" The actual difference in in signal strength, and it was found to be 15 dB.
The Yaesu FT70/G:
Here is the other side of the Two-Element, Broadside Array
Standard, Dual-banana plugs make excellent connectors for
Berryessa Park (San Jose, California)
Next are some photo's of a recent deployment of an AN/PRC70
This dipole antenna system is 110 feet long, similar in length to a "G5RV" dipole, and is fed with 3/4-inch plastic ladder-line. This photo shows a total of 3 of the AB777 masts which are fully-extended.
Here is the same antenna system with the support masts collapsed to a height of only 2-1/2 feet off the ground. The signal-strength reports indicated about a 1 S-unit decrease in signal level (-6 dB) from the signal levels found with the supports fully extended to 6-feet.
The center support mast has an insulator which is machined out of "Delrin" plastic material. The insulator also has a slot in which the dipole antenna is supported.
You will notice that a bridle assembly is formed through the use of a pair of porcelain insulators, and the ladder-line feed is connected to the outer ends where the actual active segment of the dipole elements are placed.
Here I am operating the AN/PRC70 during one of our
"armyradios" radio nets. Members of the armyradios mailing
list, who are also on the U.S. West Coast, used to meet on the
Note that our current weekly net on the West Coast is:
The use of Upper-Sideband on this frequency allows other users of military radios to join us even if some of the military models of equipment only have Upper-Sideband capability. Note particularly that the "PRC70" is only designed for up to 20-Watts PEP output power in the "high-power" position. Not exactly a "QRP" radio, but for NVIS operations, a more standard 100-watt class of equipment is preferred in order to overcome the additional losses inherent in "close-to-the-ground" operations.
"Rules of Thumb" that were generated, based on the
Based on actual documented tests between the station in Menlo Park and my station at the "San Jose Rose Garden" Municipal Park, This data tends to show that antenna height above ground is not be the predominant factor in establishing communications.
For a 10 Watt radio to receive an "S8" signal report with a half-wave dipole at 10-1/2 inches off the ground on plastic tent stakes, it is apparent that the most important factor is proper choice of operating frequency. The Rose Garden tests were able to be done during a time when our Solar Sunspot activity produced a 10.7 cm solar flux value appropriate for the operating frequency used for this test. It was, at the time of the test, in the 180's to 190's. As of today's writing of this article ( January 23rd, 2000 ) report solar flux indexes are in the same region of the mid to mid 190's.
Why high transmission angles are important:
Illustrated here is an approximate representation of the height of the ionosphere's "F-Layer" in relation to the direct distance between San Jose, and Sacramento, California. This sketch indicates why a traditional mobile whip antenna, with vertical polarization, places the major-lobe of a mobile station's energy level in an incorrect direction.
The 90-statute mile distance between these two points require a vertical take-off angle of 80-degrees in order to place the signal in an optimum direction:
FURTHER COMMENTS ON NVIS:
The U.S. Army did quite a bit of study toward the end of the Vietnam conflict on how to use HF radio more effectively and reliably. This effort was published in issues of "Army Communicator" magazine by Lt. Colonel David Fiedler starting in the early 1980's. Lt. Col Fiedler found that other countries, including German Ground Mechanized units of WWII, and the Soviet Union of today had implemented NVIS Since the summer of 1990, I have presented the NVIS concept at two west coast ARRL conventions and many local radio club meetings, as a way of publicizing this concept within the amateur radio community. Also, Ed Farmer, AA6ZM wrote a very extensive and well researched article on NVIS in the January 1995 issue of QST Magazine.
As a result of this work, Stanly Harter of the State of California Office of Emergency Services has taken a serious look at the value of HF communications for disaster communications. This is especially valuable for units like our California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF), where operations in remote areas not served by the usual VHF and UHF mountain-top repeater sites could impact their ability to communicate effectively. Stanly Harter has also made recommendations for changes in HF antenna designs on their facilities used by State OES in order to effectively utilize the NVIS Concept.
In 1989, Just prior to the Loma Prietta earthquake here in the bay area, I had finished an equipment recommendation for the Director of our GSA-Communications Division with the City of San Jose. Included in the design of the radio equipment to by used by our San Jose Office of Emergency Services was an HF station which emphasized the use of NVIS high-angle skywave so that our center would have both County-wide and also solid, Northern and Central California coverage via HF communications. The Antenna consists of a 55 foot end-fed wire antenna mounted between two radio towers on the roof of our dispatch facility. At the top of one of these towers is an SGC "Smart-Tuner" which can then tune this horizontal wire on any frequency from 1.6 to 30 Mhz. The HF Radio used is a model RF3200 made by Harris/RF Communications Group. This HF station meets Part 90 rules for commercial type acceptance, and also covers any frequency from 1.6 to 30 Mhz. In an emergency, this station is capable of communications with State of California's Office of Emergency Services over their "Operation Secure" HF radio system.
DEPLOYABLE FIELD ANTENNAS:
Much experimentation has been done with horizontal antennas that
are close to the ground.
results are outlined in the larger body of work that is listed earlier in this article.
The tent-stake method is sort of like the antenna arrangement from a company
called "Eyring Research".
A common Military/Covert-Ops antenna for NVIS use is the
AS2259/GR. This antenna
There is an article on the web written by Dr. Carl O. Jelinek in
which he details
A well-written discussion of the "Two-wire,
Terminated, Folded Dipole" , or "T2FD"
Send mail to
questions or comments about this web site.